Oprah is appealing because her narratives disguise the role of political, economic and social structures in “peoples lives”. They construct the American nightmare seem attainable

In Oprah Winfrey lore, one particular narrative is recurred over and over. When Oprah was 17, she won the Miss Fire Prevention Contest in Nashville, Tennessee. Until that year every winner had had a mane of red hair, but Oprah would prove to be a game changer.

The contest was the first of many success for Oprah. She has won numerous Emmys, has been nominated for an Oscar, and is available on lists like Time’s 100 Most Influential People. In 2013, she was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. She founded the Oprah Book Club, which is often credited with resurrecting Americans’ interest in reading. Her magnanimity and philanthropic spirit are legendary.

Oprah has legions of obsessive, devoted devotees who write her letters and follow her into public restrooms. Oprah basks in their adoration:” I know people truly, actually, actually enjoy me, love me .” And she enjoys them right back. It’s part of her” higher calling “. She believes that she was put on this ground to lift people up, to help them” live the most appropriate life “. She encourages people to love themselves, believe in themselves, and follow their nightmares.

Oprah is one of a new group of elite storytellers who present practical solutions to society’s problems that can be found within the logic of existing profit-driven arrangements of production and consumption. They promote market-based solutions to the problems of corporate power, technology, gender divides, environmental degradation, estrangement and inequality.

Oprah’s popularity stems in part from her message of empathy, subsistence, and adoration in an increasingly stressful, alienating culture. Three decades of corporations restructuring their operations by eliminating occupations( through attrition, technology, and outsourcing) and razing both organized labor and the welfare government have left workers in an extremely precarious situation.

Oprah in the early days of the indicate. Photo: Everett Collection/ Rex

Today, new working-class occupations are primarily low-wage service jobs, and the perks that once went along with middle-of-the-road white-collar chores have disappeared. Flexible, project-oriented, contingent work has become the norm, enabling companies to ratchet up their requirements for all workers except those at the very top. Meanwhile, the costs of education, dwelling, childcare, and health care have skyrocketed, making it yet more difficult for individuals and households to get by, never mind prosper.

In this climate of stress and uncertainty, Oprah tells us the histories of their own lives to help us understand our sensations, cope with difficulty and improve our lives. She presents her personal jaunt and metamorphosis from poor little girl in rural Mississippi to billionaire oracle as a framework for overcoming misery and observing” a sweet life “.

Oprah’s biographical narrative has been managed, mulled over, and mauled in the public gaze for 30 times. She employed her precocious intelligence and humor to channel the suffering of abuse and poverty into building an empire. She was on television by the age of 19 and had her own prove within a decade.

The 1970 s feminist movement opened the door to the domestic, private realm, and the reveal walked in a decade afterward, transgressing new ground as a public space to discuss personal troubles affecting Americans, particularly women. Oprah broached topics( divorce, depression, alcoholism, child abuse, adultery, incest) that had never before been discussed with such candor and empathy on television.

The show’s evolution over the decades mirrored the evolution of Oprah’s own life. In its early years the indicate followed a “recovery model” in which guests and onlookers were encouraged to overcome their problems through self-esteem house and learning to enjoy themselves.

US President Barack Obama presents broadcast correspondent Oprah Winfrey with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Photograph: Mandel Ngan/ AFP/ Getty Images

But as copycat demonstrates and criticisms of” trash talk” increased in the early 1990 s, Oprah changed the show’s format. In 1994, Oprah declared that she was done with “victimization” and negativity:” It’ s time to move on from’ We are dysfunctional’ to’ What are we going to do about it ?'” Oprah credited her decision to her own personal evolution:” People must develop and change” or” they will shrivel up” and” their souls will diminish “.

In an appearing on Larry King Live, Oprah acknowledged that she had become concerned about the message of her indicate and so had decided to embark on a new mission” to lift people up “. Topics of spirituality and empowerment displaced themes of personal pathology. For Oprah, the change was total:” Today I try to do well and be well with everyone I reach or encounter. I make sure to use my life for that which can be of goodwill. Yes, this has brought me great wealth. More important, it has fortified me spiritually and emotionally .”

A stream of self-help gurus have spent period on Oprah’s stage over the past decade and a half, all with the same message. You have options in life. External circumstances don’t determine your life. You do. It’ s all inside you, in your brain, in your wishes and longings. Guess are destiny, so reckoning positive beliefs will enable positive things to happen.

When bad things happen to us, it’s because we’re depicting them toward us with unhealthy thoughts and behaviors.” Don’t complain about what you don’t have. Use what you’ve got. To do less than your best is a sin. Every single one of us has the power for greatness because greatness is established by service–to yourself and others .” If we listen to that quiet “whisper” and fine-tune our” internal, moral, emotional GPS”, we too can read the secret of success.

Janice Peck, in her operate as professor of journalism and communication analyzes, has examined Oprah for years. She highlights the fact that to understand the Oprah phenomenon we must return to the ideas swirling around in the Gilded Age. Peck discovers strong parallels in the mind-cure motion of the Gilded Age and Oprah’s evolving enterprise in the New Gilded Age, the epoch of neoliberalism. She argues that Oprah’s enterprise strengthens the neoliberal focus on the self: Oprah’s” enterprise[ is] an ensemble of ideological practices that help legitimize a world of growing inequality and diminishing possibilities by promoting and incarnating a configuration of ego compatible with that world .”

Nothing captures this ensemble of ideological practices better than O Magazine, the purpose of which is to” help women ensure every experience and challenge as an opportunity to grow and detect their best ego. To convince girls that the real purpose are getting more and more of who they genuinely are. To embrace “peoples lives” .” O Magazine implicitly, and sometimes explicitly, identifies a range of difficulties in neoliberal capitalism and suggests styles for readers to adapt themselves to mitigate or overcome these problems.

Does your 60 hour-a-week desk chore construct your back suffer and leave you emotionally depleted and stressed? Of course it does. Analyse show that” fatality by office chore” is real: people who sit at a desk the working day are more likely to be obese, depressed, or only dead for no discernible reason. But you can dull these effects and improve your wellness with these O-approved strategies: Become more of an” out-of-the-box intellectual” because creative people are healthier. Bring photos, posters, and” kitschy figurines” to decorate your workspace:” You’ll feel less emotionally wearied and reduce burnout .” Write down three positive things that happened during your workday every night before leaving the agency to” reduce stress and physical pain from project “.

In December 2013, O devoted a whole issue to anxiety and worry. The questions” subdues a lifetime’ s worth of nervousness and misgivings”, an apt subject given rising high levels of anxiety across the age spectrum.

In the issue, bibliotherapists Ella Berthoud and Susan Elderkin present a list of volumes for the anxious, prescribing them instead of a” trip to the pharmacy “. Feeling claustrophobic because you’re too poor to move out of your mothers’ house? Read Little House on the Prairie. Feeling stressed because your current project at work is ending and you don’t have another lined up? Read The Man Who Planted Trees. Obsessed that you won’t be able to pay the rent because you just lost your job? Read The Wind-Up Bird Chronicles.” Instead of feeling depressed, follow the lead hero Toru Okada, who, while jobless, embarks on a fantastic liberating pilgrimage that changes the route he thinks .”

Oprah recognizes the pervasiveness of anxiety and estrangement in national societies. But instead of examining the economic or political basis of these seems, she advises us to turn our gaze inward and reconfigure ourselves to become more adaptable to the vagaries and emphasizes of the neoliberal moment.

Oprah is appealing precisely because her narratives disguise the role of political, economic, and social structures. In doing so, they make the American Dream seem attainable. If we just fix ourselves, we can achieve our goals. For some people, the American daydream is attainable, but to understand the chances for everyone, we need to look dispassionately at key factors that shape success.

Oprah Winfrey gestures during the videotapeing of “Oprah’s Surprise Spectacular” in Chicago May 17, 2011. Photo: John Gress/ Reuters

The current incarnation of the American Dream narrative holds that if you acquire enough culture capital( skills and education) and social capital( connections, access to networks ), you will be able to translate that capital into both economic capital( money) and happiness. Cultural capital and social capital are seen as there for the taking( particularly with advances in internet engineering ), so the only additional necessary parts are pluck, fervour, and perseverance — all attributes who were reportedly come from inside us.

The American dreaming is premised on the assumption that if you work hard, economic possibility will present itself, and financial stability will follow, but the role of culture and social capital in paving the road to wealth and fulfilment, or blocking it, may be just as important as economic capital. Some people are able to translate their skills, knowledge, and linkages into economic opportunity and financial stability, and some are not–either because their skills, knowledge, and linkages don’t seem to work as well, or they can’t acquire them in the first place because they’re too poor.

Today, the centrality of social and cultural capital is obliterated( sometimes deliberately ), as demonstrated in the implicit and explicit message of Oprah and her ideological colleagues. In their tales, and many others like them, culture and social capital are easy to acquire. They tell us to get an education. Too poor? Take an online course. Go to Khan Academy. They tell us to meet people, build up our network. Don’t have any connected own family members? Join LinkedIn.

It’s simple. Anyone can become anything. There’s no differences between the quality and productivity of various types of people’s social and cultural capital. We’re all building our abilities. We’re all networking.

This is a fiction. If all or most different forms of social and cultural capital were equally valuable and accessible, we should ascertain the effects of this in increased upward mobility and wealth made anew by new people in each generation rather than passed down and expanded from one generation to the next. The data do not demonstrate this upward mobility.

The US, in a sample of 13 wealthy countries, ranks highest in inequality and lowest in intergenerational earnings mobility. Wealth isn’t earned fresh in each new generation by plucky go-getters. It is passed down, saved, and expanded through generous tax laws and the assiduous transmission of social and cultural rights capital.

The way Oprah tells us to get through it all and recognise our nightmares is always to adapt ourselves to the changing world , not to change “the worlds” we live in. We demand little or nothing from the system, from the collective apparatus of powerful people and institutions. We simply make requirements of ourselves.

We are the perfect, depoliticized, complacent neoliberal subjects.

And yet we’re not. The popularity of strategies for alleviating alienation remainders on our deep, collective desire for meaning and creativity. Literary critic and political theorist Fredric Jameson would say that the Oprah narratives, and others like them, are able to” oversee our desires” only because they appeal to deep fantasies about how we want to live “peoples lives”. This, after all, is what the American dreaming narrative is about- not inevitably a description of life lived, but a eyesight of how life should be lived.

When the stories that manage our desires break their promises over and over, the narratives themselves become fuel for change and open a space for new, revolutionary stories. These new stories must feature collective requirements that provide a critical perspective on the real limits to success in our society and encouraging a vision of life that does fulfill the desire for self-actualization.

Read more: http :// www.theguardian.com/ us